FOR AI TEAMS
Put legal AI
to the test.
Work with legal experts on difficult tasks, reference answers and the criteria used to judge them.
Discuss a projectWhat does this record establish?
Assess whether three source records establish complete preservation.
Read the three sources
Preserve business messages from 1 March onward, including messages on personal devices.
Automatic message deletion disabled.
Export covers 1 April–10 May. Personal devices are not included.
Complete preservation is not established.
The request was issued on 4 May, but automatic deletion was not disabled until 9 May [01, 02]. The export starts one month after the requested start date and excludes personal devices [01, 03].
Confirm coverage for March and personal-device messages, and whether any messages were deleted before 9 May. This record alone does not establish data loss.
WORKING TOGETHER
What experts
produce.
Start with one legal workflow and the output your project needs.
Read the evaluation pilot guideTasks and reference answers
Original legal problems, permitted source material and reference answers that explain the reasoning.
Answer reviews
Judgments against agreed criteria, with supporting evidence and reasons for disagreements.
Evaluation criteria
Checks for accuracy, source use, missing facts and unsupported conclusions. Keep evaluation material separate from training.
BUILD WITH REASONING
Start with
one workflow.
Tell us what your model needs to do, the legal expertise it needs and the output you want back. We’ll agree on permitted materials, scope and availability together.
Discuss a projectHave a source collection in mind? We can discuss permissions and intended use.